Sasha Grey...The "New Breed" of Porno???

You can read the full interview at http://adultfyi.com/read.php?ID=33312

With this stupid bitch, things always boil down to one, solitary throwaway line. This week, the whore says, "I am the new breed."

"New breed" of porno performers? I don't really know what that means, unless it's a reference to the two weeks she spent in the hospital with a major case of anal warts. Or that she stayed off the heroin long enough in high school to remember a few lines from Sartre, allowing herself to claim to be some uber-existentialist. Maybe she'll end up inking herself up like Joanna Angel, another delusional alt.whore.

There are no such things as porno whores who became "mainstream" actresses. Marilyn Chambers found this out. Ginger Lynn found this out, so did Traci Lords. Soon Sasha Grey will learn the same thing.

And what a stretch--she plays a hooker. Stormy Daniels does the same thing, going around claiming she's a "mainstream" actress because she appeared in two films, one where she plays a porno whore, and another where she plays a stripper. I bet that's the kind of acting range that just makes Meryl Streep green with envy.

Oh and if you're interested, read the extremely lukewarm reviews of the whore's performance at IMDB, where it was described thusly, "There has been a lot of talk about the lead actress. Yes she is a porn star, and her acting verifies this...."

Check IAFD, she gets her ass pounded about 1/3 of the time. If she's too stupid to realize this kind of "performance art" limits her to the sweaty warehouses of Chatsworth and Canoga Park, then just sit back and watch the delusions roll over her for the next three or four years, when people stop hiring her, and a personal reality terrifingly sets over her:

"ZOMG, maybe it wasn't such a good idea to get into porno!!!!"

PissonStormy.net - Topic 4: Can A Whore Actually Have Moral Superiority?

Well now, time to bring in an interesting question: can a whore who lets halfway house parolees unload their testicles onto her face actually have a sense of moral superiority? You might automatically say, No, but we're talking about Louisiana, probably the most backward state in the Union.

See, the incumbent Senator, David Vitter, has his own proclivity for sex---with hookers. But let's back up. I personally would never vote for Mr. Vitter based on his political beliefs alone. He supports policies and spending appropriations which blur the line between church and state. He wants to abolish the federal estate tax, but can't seem to find which federal agencies to eliminate to compensate for the massive reduction in federal revenue. But then again, there is the issue of Pamela Martin, the "Canal Street Madam," whose little black book contained Mr. Ritter's phone number. His number in the Dirksen Federal Office building! Later revelations indicated Mr. Ritter availed himself of Ms. Martin's services five times. Long story short...he apologized for his misdeeds and is still a sitting Senator.

So here's the dilemma: would you vote for someone who has had relations with a prostitute, or someone whose profession is not prostitution itself only because of a legal blur?